原文地址：http://www.modularcircuits.com/blog/articles/h-bridge-secrets/sign-magnitude-drive/
本文为翻译校正稿件，含有译者个人理解
In this article I’ll talk about one of the popular drive-modes of H-bridges, the Sign-magnitude drive in detail. If you’re not familiar with H-bridges in general, I suggest you read the previous part of the series first, where we’ve looked at the basic operating principles of an H-bridge and went through the various meaningful operating modes.
在本文中，我将详细讨论 h 桥流行的驱动模式之一符号幅度驱动。如果您通常不熟悉 h 桥，我建议您首先阅读本系列文章的前一部分，其中我们了解了 h 桥的基本操作原理，并介绍了各种有意义的操作模式。
Let’s quickly review the basics first! Our H-bridge looks like this:We will also make use of our motor equivalent circuit that I’ve introduced before:
让我们先快速回顾一下基础知识！我们的 H桥是这样的: 我们还将使用我之前介绍过的电机等效电路:
![image_thumb[10]](http://modularcircuits.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/image_thumb101.png)
In sign-magnitude drive, we have four control modes to choose from（we use ‘0’ replace ‘close’ and ‘1’ instead ‘open’ ）:
在符号-幅值驱动中，我们有四种控制模式可供选择:（我们使用1代表打开，0代表关闭）
| notes：Reversal then Slide | ||||
| Mapping 1 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| on-time state | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| off-time state | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
之前文章中已经讲过，在导通（on-time state）状态：即所谓的电机运行过程中，对角线的开关管是被打开的，而
| notes：Reversal then Break | ||||
| Mapping 2 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| on-time state | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 |
| off-time state | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| notes：Forward then Slide | ||||
| Mapping 5 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| on-time state | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| off-time state | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| notes：Forward then Break | ||||
| Mapping 6 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| on-time state | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| off-time state | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
These modes describe the way we map the states of the four switches to the ‘on-time’ and the ‘off-time’ of our PWM control signal. If you carefully investigate these tables, you’ll see that the four options describe the four possibilities for two binary choices: whether to keep the a-side or the b-side in a constant state, and whether to keep the low-side or the high-side switch closed continuously.
这些模式描述了我们将四个开关的状态映射到PWM控制的“开启时间”和“关闭时间”的方式。如果仔细研究这些表，您将看到这四个选项描述了两个二进制选择的四种可能性：是保持a侧还是b侧处于恒定状态，以及是保持低压侧还是高压侧开关持续闭合。。
You will see pretty soon that one of these binary choices is usually made statically, while a control signal is used to decide between the remaining two choices.
您很快就会看到，其中一个二进制选项通常是静态地执行的，而控制信号用于在其余两个选项之间做出选择。
However, for now, let’s just concentrate on mapping 1 and see, how the bridge operates! As the mapping tells us, during the on-time, Q1 and Q4 are closed. This means that the left-side of the motor is connected to Vbat, while the right-side is grounded. Current can flow from the supply through the motor:
但是，现在，让我们集中精力在下面的映射上，看看这个桥是如何操作的！正如映射告诉我们的那样，在工作状态时，Q1和 Q4是导通的。这意味着电机的左侧连接到 Vbat，而右侧接地。电流可以通过电动机从电源流出:
| notes：Reversal then Slide | ||||
| Mapping 1 | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 |
| on-time state | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| off-time state | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
When the off-time comes along, Q1 stays closed, but Q4 opens and Q3 closes instead. In this state, there’s no path from the supply to ground through the bridge. However, both of the motor terminals are connected to Vbat, basically short-circuiting the motor. If there was current flowing through the motor at the time the switch-over happened, that current can continue circulating around the in that loop:
当休息时间到来时，Q1保持关闭状态，但 Q4开启，Q3关闭。在这种状态下，没有通过桥梁从供应点到地面的路径。然而，两个电机终端都连接到 Vbat 上，基本上使电机短路。如果在开关切换时有电流通过电机，那么电流可以继续在回路中循环:
The voltages and the current through the bridge will follow the following wave-forms:
通过电桥的电压和电流将遵循以下波形（下面的波形中高低只表示某一侧的状态是否有翻转）:
The average voltage the motor sees can be calculated as the following:
电机所能看到的平均电压可以计算如下:
Vmot_avg = Vbat * ton/tcycle, 其中 tcycle 是循环时间，ton + toff = tcycle
From this equation something should be immediately obvious: this mapping can’t move the motor backwards. For that we would need to be able to apply a negative (average) voltage to the motor terminals, but that’s not possible: the motor voltage can only be adjusted between 0 and Vbat. That would be a problem, but if we do the same math for mapping 5, we’ll see that in that mode, the opposite is true: that mode can only turn the motor in the reverse direction and the average motor voltage can only be between 0 and -Vbat.
从这个方程式可以看出，有些东西是显而易见的: 这种映射不能使电机向后移动。为此，我们将需要能够适用于负(平均)电压的电机终端，但这是不可能的: 电机电压只能调整0和 Vbat 之间。这是个问题，但是如果我们用同样的数学方法来计算映射5，我们会发现在这种模式下，反过来也是正确的: 这种模式只能使电动机转向相反的方向，而电动机的平均电压只能在0到-Vbat 之间。
In order to make a functional H-bridge, we need to employ both of these mappings and introduce a control signal that can choose between the two. This is the origin of the name of the drive mode: one control signal – the one that chooses between the two mappings – is used to determine the ‘sign’ of the voltage applied to the motor, while the other – the PWM signal – is used to determine the ‘magnitude’ of that (average) voltage.
为了构造一个H桥的函数，我们需要利用这两种映射，并引入一个控制信号在两者之间进行选择。这是驱动模式名称的起源: 一个控制信号——在两个映射之间选择的信号——用来确定施加到电机的电压的“符号” ，而另一个—— PWM 信号——用来确定该(平均)电压的“幅值”。
The remaining two mappings are only slightly different from the previous two: the difference is that, during the off-time, instead of the two high-side switches, the two low-side ones are turned on. This means that the motor terminals are both connected to ground instead of the battery, but they are still shorted together and the motor current still circulates inside the bridge during the off-time:
其余两个映射与前两个只有轻微的不同: 不同之处在于，在关闭时间期间，两个低端开关被打开，而不是两个高端开关。这意味着电动机的两个端子都连接到地上，而不是电池，但它们仍然短路在一起，电动机电流在休息时间仍然在桥内循环:
Let’s take a closer look now at the way the current flows in the system! During the ‘on-time’ the motor inductors see a voltage difference of Vbat-Vg (provided the motor rotates in the same direction, the bridge tries to rotate it). If we disregard the internal resistance of the motor for a minute (or assume that the switching frequency is much higher than the electrical resonance frequency of the motor) this voltage will create a linear current ramp on the inductor (dI/dt = V/Lm). Since we assume Vbat is constant, the slope of the current increase will be determined by Vg, or in other words by the speed of the motor.
现在让我们仔细看看电流在当前系统中流动的方式！在“工作”期间，电机电感上有 Vbat-Vg 的电压差(如果电机在同一方向旋转，电桥试图旋转它)。如果我们忽略电机的内部电阻(或假设开关频率远高于电机的谐振电路频率) ，这个电压将在电感器上产生一个线性电流斜坡(dI/dt = V/Lm)。由于我们假设 Vbat 是常数，电流增加的斜率将由 Vg 决定，或者换句话说由电机的速度决定。
When the motor runs under no load Vg is very close to Vbat, so the current will change very slowly. If the motor is stalled, the current will rise much faster, as Vg is 0. The fastest current rise will happen if we abruptly change the drive direction from full-speed one way to full-speed the other way. In that case Vg will be close to Vbat in absolute value, but reversed in polarity.
当电机空载运行时，Vg 非常接近 Vbat，因此电流变化非常缓慢。如果电动机停止工作，电流上升速度会更快，因为 Vg 为0。如果我们突然改变驱动方向，从全速一个方向到全速另一个方向，那么当前最快的上升就会发生。在这种情况下，Vg 的绝对值将接近 Vbat，但在极性上则相反。
During the off-time, the motor is short-circuited. If we disregard the internal resistance of the switches and the motor, the current can flow without interruption, and the inductors see Vg between their terminals. The current will start decreasing linearly, determined by the generator voltage and the motor inductor.
在停机时间，电机短路。如果我们忽略开关和电动机的内部电阻，电流可以不间断地流动，电感器看到两端之间的 Vg。由发电机电压和电机电感决定，电流将线性地开始减小。
We say the bridge operates in a steady state if the cycle-to-cycle averages if the various parameters (voltages, currents) remain constant. The motor doesn’t accelerate nor decelerates and outputs a constant torque.
我们说，如果各种参数的平均值(电压、电流)在一个周期到另外一个周期内保持不变，则电桥工作在一个稳定状态。该电机不加速或减速，并输出一个恒定的扭矩。
If things don’t change from cycle-to-cycle, it means that the motor current at the beginning of a cycle must be the same as at the end. Of course this doesn’t mean that the current stays constant during the cycle and this current-change is called ripple-current. Assuming linear current change during both the on- and the off time, the current deltas are the following:
如果没有参数被改变，这意味着电机电流在一个周期的开始和结束都是相同的。当然，这并不意味着电流在周期中保持恒定，这种电流的变化被称为纹波电流。假设电流在开启和关闭期间线性变化，当前的电流变化如下:
Iripple = (Vbat-Vg)/Lm*ton = Vg/Lm*toff
If we express Vg from this, we get:
如果我们从这里表达 Vg，我们会得到:
Vg = Vbat* ton/(ton+toff) = Vbat * ton/tcycle = Vmot_avg
What we get is this: in a steady-state, the generator voltage must be equal to the average voltage the motor sees. The average current will be whatever it needs to be to reach that condition. Now, if we put this Vg back to the current equation, we get this:
从上面的式子，我们得到: 在稳态下，发电机电压等于马达所能看到的平均电压。平均电流将是达到这个条件所需的任何电流。现在，如果我们把这个 Vg 放回到当前的等式中，我们会得到:
Iripple = Vbat / Lm / tcycle * ton*toff
既然 toff = tcycle-ton:
Iripple = Vbat / Lm / tcycle * ton*(tcycle-ton)
This is a second-order function (a parabola) with its maximum at ton = tcycle/2. So the ripple current reaches its maximum at 50% duty cycle, and its value is:
这是一个二阶函数(抛物线) ，其最大值为 ton = tcycle/2。纹波电流在50% 占空比时候达到最大值，其值为:
Iripple_max = Vbat / Lm * tcycle/4
If you recall, the generator voltage is proportional to speed and current is proportional to torque. From the previous chapter it seems as though we have perfect speed control: the speed which is proportional to the generator voltage is equal to the average voltage seen by the motor, which in turn only depends on the duty cycle of the PWM input, our control signal. The torque (current) on the motor will be whatever it has to be to make that happen.
回忆一下，发电机的电压与速度成正比，电流与扭矩成正比。从前一章看来，似乎我们有完美的速度控制: 与速度成正比的发电机电压等于电机的平均电压，这反过来只取决于PWM 输入的占空比，我们的控制信号。电动机上的转矩(电流)将是使其发生的任何因素。
There’s something wrong with that picture isn’t here? After all we know that DC motors don’t keep a constant speed under load changes without any control circuit. True, and it’s easy to see what the problem is: we disregarded the internal resistance of the motor (and the switches).
那这种情况下有什么问题吗？然而，我们知道，当负载变化时，如果没有任何对电流的控制，直流电动机的速度将无法保持不变。是的，很容易看出问题所在: 我们忽视了电机的(和开关)的内阻。
Once you take those into account, you’ll see, that the motor current drops some voltage on those resistors, and the inductor sees only the remainder. (In the following equation I’ve made the simplification to assume that the motor current doesn’t change much, so the voltage drop on the resistor is relatively constant during the on- and off-times.)
一旦你把这些考虑进去，你会看到，电流在这些电动机的电阻器上产生了压降，而电感器只得到了了剩余的电压。(在下面的公式中，我简化了一下，假设电动机的电流变化不大，因此电阻器上的电压降在工作状态切换时相对恒定。)在工作状态和休息的情况下：
VL_on = Vbat – Vg – Imot_avg*Rm
VL_off = -Vg – Imot_avg*Rm
If you put this into our previous ripple-current equation, you’ll see the result is a current- (or torque-) dependent difference between our intended speed and the actual speed of the motor:
如果你把它放进我们之前的纹波电流方程式，你会看到我们的预期速度和电机实际速度之间的电流(或转矩)依赖性差异:
Vg = Vbat * ton/tcycle – Imot_avg*Rm = Vmot_avg – Imot_avg*Rm
反电动势 = 电池电压*占空比 - 平均电流*电机内阻 = 电机平均电压 - 电机平均电流*电机内阻
In the previous chapter we calculated the ripple current, but we kept saying that the average motor current (in the ideal case at least) will settle at whatever level it needs to to make Vg equal to Vmot_avg. This statement has an interesting consequence: we can’t predict the direction the current will flow during the on-time and the off-time. In fact, if Imot_avg is lower than half of Iripple, the motor current changes direction twice during the cycle:
在前一章中我们计算了纹波电流，我们一直说,电机平均电流(至少在理想情况下)将稳定在它需要的任何水平，使 Vg 等于 Vmot _ avg。这种说法有一个有趣的后果: 我们无法预测电流在工作和非工作状态下的流向。事实上，如果 Imot_avg 低于 Iripple 的一半，电机电流在周期中会两次改变方向:
Now, one of those direction changes happen during the off-time, when the motor is short-circuited, but the other happens when the motor is connected to the supply. What follows is that at the beginning of every on-time for a short while at least, the current flows out of the bridge. Most supplies can’t deal with this quick reversal of current flow and if the reverse-current can’t find its way back to the power supply, the supply voltage will start rising potentially to dangerous levels.
现在，其中一个方向的改变发生在停机时间，当电机被短路，并且，电机连接到电源。接下来就是在每次工作状态开始的时候，至少有一段时间，电流会从H桥流出。大多数电源无法处理这种电流的快速反转，如果反向电流无法找到回到电源的路，电源电压将开始上升，可能达到危险的水平。
To handle this reverse current properly we need to put a capacitor on the input terminals of the bridge to temporarily soak up the current coming from the bridge. The capacitor will release it’s extra charge back into the motor in the part of the cycle when the current flows to the ‘proper’ direction:
为了正确处理这个反向电流，我们需要在电桥的输入端安装一个电容器，暂时吸收来自电桥的电流。当电流流向正确的方向时，电容器会释放多余的电量返回到电动机中:
But just how big this capacitor needs to be? Well, that depends on a lot of things, so let’s list them:
但是这个电容器到底需要多大呢？好吧，这取决于很多因素，所以让我们列出它们:
Since some of these parameters are dependent on the operating conditions and the exact application, let’s first do some simplifications and assume worst-case conditions:
由于其中一些参数取决于操作条件和确切的应用，让我们首先进行一些简化，并假设最坏的情况:
Under those conditions, the current will rise for 50% of the time, and cross 0 at 25% of the total cycle time:
在这些条件下，电流将上升50% 的时间，在25% 的总周期时间处变成0:
The total charge released back to the system during the first-half of the on-time is:
在上半个工作时间内释放回系统的总电荷如下:
Qrelease = 1/2*((Iripple_max/2)*ton/2)
Q = It = CU
We also know that
我们也知道
ton = tcycle/2
Finally we know our ripple current is at its maximum:
最后，我们知道我们的纹波电流达到了最大值:
Iripple_max = Vbat / Lm * tcycle/4
Putting these together and do some simplifications, we get:
把这些放在一起并进行一些简化，我们得到:
Qrelease = 1/64 * Vbat / Lm * tcycle2
If we assume that the power supply can’t take any of this charge as we’ve said before – in other words all of it needs to be stored in the capacitor – the capacitor voltage will rise:
如果我们假设电源不能像我们之前说的那样吸收这些电荷——换句话说，所有的电荷都需要储存在电容器中——那么电容器的电压就会升高:
Vbat_ripple = Qrelease/C
So if we know how much change in the supply voltage we can tolerate, we get a capacitor value:
因此，如果我们知道我们能够容忍的电源电压的变化有多大，我们就得到了一个电容值:
C = Qrelease/Vmax_bat_ripple
Substituting Qrelease we get:
代换 Qrelease 我们得到:
C = 1/64 * Vbat/Vmax_bat_ripple / Lm * tcycle^2
Note that the term Vbat/Vmax_bat_ripple is the ratio between the supply voltage and the ripple voltage allowed on the it. If for example we allow for 5% ripple, this value is a constant 20 independent of the supply level. Also note that the capacitance value needed increases quadratically with the cycle time.
请注意，术语 Vbat/Vmax _ bat _ ripple 是电源电压和它所允许的纹波电压之间的比值。例如，如果我们允许5% 的纹波，这个值是一个常数20。还要注意，所需的电容值随周期时间二次增加。
I’ve measured a few motors, and the lowest inductance value I’ve seen was in the order of 30µH, but of course this value varies a lot from motor to motor. So, to give you actual numbers, let’s take that 30µH inductance value, allow for a 5% ripple on the power supply and a 20kHz switching frequency. With that, we get a minimum ~26µF of capacitance needed on the power supply. If we only want to switch at – let’s say – 1kHz though, the capacitance needed is more than 10000µF!
我测量了一些电机，我看到的最低电感值大约是30uh，当然这个值在不同的电动机之间变化很大。所以，为了给出实际的数字，让我们用30 uh 的电感值，考虑电源5% 的纹波和20kHz 的开关频率。这样，我们就得到了电源所需的最小26 uf 的电容。如果我们只想在1kHz的频率下开关，那么所需的电容将超过10000µF！
作者计算过程：
C = 1/64 * 20/（30*（10^-6）*(5*（10^-5）)^2 = 2.6*10^-5 F = 26uF
按照这个公式，我电机电感0.23mH，假设允许10%的纹波，
C = 1/64 * 10/（0.23*10^-3）*(5*10^-5)^2 = 3.396*10^-7 F = 33.96uF
Whenever Vg is not equal to Vmot_avg, the bridge is not in steady-state. When it is lower, the motor is accelerating, when it is higher, it is braking. We’ve seen above that the on-time current change is:
当 Vg 不等于 Vmot _ avg 时，H桥就不处于稳定状态。当它是低，电机加速，当它是高，它是制动。我们已经看到上面提到的工作状态电流变化是:
Idelta_on = (Vbat-Vg)/Lm*ton
while the off-time current change is:
而空闲时间的电流变化是:
Idelta_off = Vg/Lm*toff
Let’s express Vbat from Vmot_avg and put that into the first equation! We get:
让我们用 Vmot_avg 来表示 Vbat，并把它放到第一个方程中:
Idelta_on = (Vmot_avg-Vg)/Lm*ton + Vmot_avg/Lm*toff
Next, let’s see what the difference between the current at the beginning of the on-time and the end of the off-time:
接下来，让我们看看工作状态的电流和非工作状态的电流有什么不同:
Idelta_cycle = Idelta_on – Idelta_off = (Vmot_avg-Vg)/Lm*ton + Vmot_avg/Lm*toff – Vg/Lm*toff
Idelta _ cycle = Idelta _ on-Idelta _ off = (Vmot _ avg-vg)/Lm * ton + Vmot _ avg/Lm * toff-vg/Lm * toff
After some re-arranging:
经过一些重新安排:
Idelta_cycle = (Vmot_avg-Vg)/Lm*tcycle
In other words, the motor current changes from cycle to cycle proportionally to the difference between the intended generator voltage (Vmot_avg) and the actual generator voltage (Vg).
换句话说，电机电流随着发电机预期电压(Vmot _ avg)和实际发电机电压(Vg)之间的差值而变化。
Since current is proportional to torque, this means that if there’s a difference between the two voltages, the torque will start changing linearly. In this simple model, the current would keep changing forever, but in reality that of course isn’t the case. For one, internal losses limit the maximum current as we’ll see in a minute, but eventually, the changed torque would hopefully change the motor speed as well, bringing it closer to Vmot_avg, slowing down the current change. Eventually a new steady-state is reached where Vg is equal to Vmot_avg and the torque changed to a new value that is needed in order to maintain that balance. (If you read the article on motor modeling, you’ll see that in many cases the motor and the attached mechanical system can be modeled as a large capacitor and some sort of loss. That capacitor, with the internal internal resistance of the motor determines the time-constant by which this new steady-state is reached, and the actual response will be closer to an exponential curve.)
由于电流与扭矩成正比，这意味着如果两个电压之间存在差异，扭矩将开始线性变化。在这个简单的模型中，当前的情况将永一直持续，但实际上当然不是这样。一方面，内部损耗限制了最大电流，我们将在后面看到，但最终，改变的转矩将有希望改变电机的速度，使其更接近 Vmot 平均值，减缓电流的变化。最终达到一个新的稳定状态，其中 Vg 等于 Vmot _ avg，并且转矩转换为一个新的值，这个值是维持这个平衡所必需的。(如果你阅读关于电机建模的文章，你会发现在许多情况下，电机和附加的机械系统可以被建模为一个大电容器和一些损失。这个电容器，加上电动机的内部电阻，决定了达到这个新的稳定状态的时间常数，并且实际的响应将接近指数曲线
Now, this is all fine for acceleration, but there’s something strange that happens during braking. When Vg is higher than Vmot_avg, the torque (current) will start decreasing. As the electrical time-constants are usually several orders of magnitude lower than the mechanical ones (again, see the article on motor modeling for the details), the current (and the torque) turns the opposite direction to the shaft rotation (generator voltage).
现在，这些对于加速来说都没问题，但是在刹车的时候会发生一些奇怪的事情。当 Vg 大于 Vmot _ avg 时，转矩(电流)开始减小。由于电气时间常数通常比机械时间常数低几个数量级(同样，详见关于电机模型的文章) ，电流(和转矩)与轴旋转(发电机电压)的方向相反。
Let’s see how big this reverse current can be, but in order to do so, we’ll first have to re-introduce the motor resistance into our model. The reason is that without the resistor, the motor current will just keep decreasing (or increasing in the negative direction) until the generator voltage changes and becomes equal to Vmot_avg. In other words, without the resistor, the motor current can be an arbitrarily large negative number. With the resistor in place however, the bridge will quickly settle to a constant cycle-to-cycle current, as the voltage drop on the resistor will put an end to the current-increase over the inductor.
让我们看看这个反向电流能有多大，但是为了做到这一点，我们首先要把电动机的电阻，重新引入到我们的模型中。原因在于，如果没有电阻器，电机电流将不断减小(或在负方向上增大) ，直到发电机电压发生变化，变成等于 Vmot _ avg。换句话说，如果没有电阻，电机的电流可以是一个任意大的负数。然而，当电阻器到位后，电桥将迅速稳定为恒定的循环电流，因为电阻器上的电压降将结束电感器上的电流增加。
Once that happens, we can use our steady-state equations, to figure out the average current:
一旦这种情况发生，我们就可以用我们的稳态方程，计算出平均电流:
Vg = Vmot_avg – Imot_avg*Rm
and solving that to the current, we get:
然后求出当前的值，我们得到:
Imot_avg = (Vmot_avg-Vg)/Rm
The reason the system can be in steady-state, while Vg is not equal to Vmot_avg is the internal motor resistance. What happens is that the internal resistance of the motor makes the cycle-to-cycle current change zero, which was the initial assumption in deriving the steady-state equations.
系统之所以能处于稳态，而 Vg 不等于 Vmot _ avg，是因为电机内部的电阻。电动机的内阻使循环电流变化为零，这是导出稳态方程的初始假设。
You can also see, that the average motor current is negative, as expected. It means that the torque is in opposite direction to the shaft rotation, so we are in fact braking the motor.
你也可以看到，电机的平均电流是负的，正如预期的那样。这意味着扭矩与轴旋转的方向相反，所以我们实际上是制动电机。
During the off-time this current is circulating through the motor and either the two low- or the two high-side FETs. However, during the on-time, the only way for the current to flow is through the supply. While the current through the motor is always in the ‘negative direction’ – more precisely opposing the generator voltage – the same current flows into the supply in the positive or negative direction, depending on which way the FETs are open during the on-time:
在关断期间，这种电流通过电机和两个低端或两个高端场效应管循环。然而，在正常工作时间内，电流流动的唯一途径是通过电源。虽然通过电动机的电流总是在“负方向”——更准确地说是与发电机电压相反——但同样的电流流入电源的方向是正方向还是负方向，取决于准时时间内场效应管打开的方向:
或
This current either charges the battery (first case), which is called regenerative braking or dis-charges it (second case), which is called dynamic braking.
这种电流要么给蓄电池充电（第一种情况），称为再生制动，要么给蓄电池放电（第二种情况），称为动力制动。
While one would think that re-charging the battery is a good thing, there are two serious limitations to the effectiveness of regenerative braking:
虽然有人会认为重新充电电池是一件好事，但再生制动的有效性有两个严重的限制:
Even if you’re fine with all the limitations above, the question still remains: what to do with the back-converted energy? If your system is battery operated, the battery may or may not absorb this energy, depending on its technology. Even more serious problem is that the amount of charge a battery can take depends on its charge level – a fully charged battery can’t take any more charge. This means that you either risk overcharging your battery or limit your braking capability at least under some circumstances. Neither options are too pleasing.
即使你对上述所有的限制都没有意见，问题仍然存在: 如何处理回收的能源？如果你的系统是电池驱动的，电池可能会也可能不会吸收这种能量，这取决于它的技术。更严重的问题是，电池的充电量取决于它的充电水平——充满电的电池不能再充电了。这意味着你要么冒着过度充电的风险，要么至少在某些情况下限制你的制动能力。两种选择都不太令人满意。
If you run your system from mains (and necessarily through a power supply, since mains is AC and we’re driving a DC motor here), you’re even more limited: unless you specially design your power supply, it simply can’t pump energy back into the power outlet.
如果你用电源来运行你的系统（而且必须通过电源，因为电源是交流的，而我们在这里驱动的是直流电机），你就更受限制了：除非你专门设计了电源，否则它根本无法将能量泵回电源插座。
In both cases it seems that your safest bet is to consume or store the regenerated energy locally. If you have other loads consuming power, of course you can power those loads up to their current requirements. You might have lights, computers, other motors, heaters, sensors, what not running at the same time, that need energy. All that is great, but you don’t want the brake distance depend on how much the seat-wormer is on in your car, do you?
在这两种情况下，你最安全的选择似乎是在本地消耗或储存再生能源。如果您有其他负载消耗电力，当然可以为这些负载供电，以满足其当前的需求。你可能有电灯，电脑，其他马达，加热器，传感器，不同时运转的东西，需要能量。这一切都很好，但你不希望刹车距离取决于这些东西吧？（留个坑，我会在后面某一节专门讲如何回收这些能量）
In other words, all these options provide some, but not very deterministic or reliable places to put energy to. What you would really need is some sort of reliable energy storage device that is not as sensitive as a battery and can store a lot of energy. Effectively a capacitor. Trouble is, actual capacitors of the sizes needed (easily several Farads) are not feasible. There is however another way (you would have to read more on mechanical modeling to understand why): stick another motor with a big wheel attached to it into your system. When you have more energy then what you know what to do with, simply spin-up the wheel to store the energy. When you are in need of energy, use (again) regenerative braking on that wheel to regain the energy and supply your needs. This is called a flywheel, and is in fact used in certain systems.
换言之，所有这些选择都提供了一些，但不是非常确定或可靠的地方来消耗能量。你真正需要的是某种可靠的储能装置，它不像电池那么灵敏，能储存大量能量。实际上是一个电容器。问题是，实际电容器的尺寸（很容易几个法拉）是不可行的。不过，还有另一种方法（你必须阅读更多关于机械建模的知识才能理解为什么）：把另一个装有大轮子的马达插入你的系统。当你的能量比你所知道的要多的时候，只需转动轮子来储存能量。当你需要能量的时候，再次使用再生制动来恢复能量并满足你的需要。这被称为飞轮，实际上在某些系统中使用。
Trains, subways and other large, but well controlled systems usually benefit from regenerative braking as well as they quite often have another consumer (another, accelerating train) that can use the regenerated energy.
列车、地铁和其他大型但控制良好的系统通常受益于再生制动，同时它们也经常有另一个耗电元件（另一个加速列车）可以利用再生能源。
As you can probably see from this much, the problem of safely and reliably putting the braking energy somewhere is a complex one. It requires full understanding of the complete electro-mechanical system, and there is no one-size fits all solution.
正如你可能会看到这么多，安全和可靠地把刹车能源的地方是一个复杂的问题。它需要对完整的机电系统有充分的了解，而且没有放之四海而皆准的解决方案。
Let’s say you don’t want to use regenerative braking because of all the complexities involved. So you want to operate in the dynamic braking mode of the bridge, and avoid regenerative braking altogether. How do you do that? The first thing you need to do is to figure out if the system is in regenerative braking mode. You can go about it in two ways:
假设你不想使用再生制动，因为这涉及到所有的复杂性。所以你要在桥的动态制动模式下运行，避免再生制动。你怎么做到的？你需要做的第一件事是弄清楚系统是否处于再生制动模式。你可以从两个方面着手：
After you have the right feedback in place, you can adjust your drive direction to make sure that Vmot_avg is always reverse in polarity than Vg any time you’re braking. But there’s another complication: how do you know you need to brake? You only know that if you know the intended and the actual speed of the motor, so you need to measure the shaft-speed (or Vg somehow) and you have to implement some sort of a control circuit.
在你得到正确的反馈后，你可以调整你的驱动方向，以确保Vmot_avg在极性上总是与Vg相反。但还有一个复杂的问题：你怎么知道你需要刹车？你只知道，如果你知道电机的预期速度和实际速度，那么你需要测量轴速度（或Vg），你必须实现某种控制电路。
If you did all that, you can successfully avoid regenerative braking. Then another problem arises: how much torque can you apply in braking mode to the shaft, provided you would only want to operate in the dynamic braking domain? We know that torque is related to the motor current and we’ve also seen that the average motor current during braking is the following:
如果你做到了这些，你就能成功地避免再生制动。然后，另一个问题出现了：如果您只想在动态制动域中操作，在制动模式下，您可以向轴施加多少扭矩？我们知道转矩与电机电流有关，而且我们还发现制动期间的平均电机电流如下：
Imot_avg = (Vmot_avg-Vg)/Rm
To make sure that the motor remains in the dynamic braking domain, you will have to make sure that Vmot_avg has the same polarity as the motor current, which is opposite to Vg. So if Vg is positive as in all of our examples so far, Vmot_avg will need to be negative. That has the unfortunate consequence that Imot_avg cannot be smaller (in absolute value) than a certain amount:
要确保Vmot_avg 的极性，和电机电流的动态极性相反。所以，如果Vg是正的，就像我们到目前为止的所有例子一样，Vmot_avg将是负的。这就产生了一个不幸的后果，即Imot_avg不能小于（绝对值）某个特定的值：
abs(Imot_avg) >= Vg/Rm
This is a problem because it tells us that we can’t brake the motor arbitrarily gently. The only way to achieve that is with regenerative braking. As a matter of fact, it also tells us that he minimum amount of braking torque we can apply to the motor depends on the speed and is proportional to it. So at high speeds we will have more abrupt braking than at low speeds.
这是一个问题，因为它告诉我们，我们不能随意地轻轻地刹车。实现这一目标的唯一方法是再生制动。事实上，它也告诉我们，我们可以施加到电动机上的最小制动力矩取决于转速，并且与转速成正比。所以在高速行驶时，我们会有比低速时更突然的刹车。
By now you probably see that dealing with bridges in phase-magnitude drive is not simple. At first sight it seems you only need two control signals – a PWM input to set the average voltage on the motor and a digital signal to set the direction – and you’re ready to go.
现在您可能已经看到，在符号-幅值驱动器中处理H桥并不简单。乍一看，似乎你只需要两个控制信号：一个 PWM 输入设置电机的平均电压和数字信号设置电机的方向-你已经迫不及待了。
Detailed analysis however shows that no matter how you operate your bridge, braking is a problem. You either use regenerative braking with all of its complications or try to avoid it which isn’t simple either. You probably need to monitor the bridge current and the supply voltage to make sure you you don’t over-charge your battery. If you want to avoid regenerative braking completely you’ll most likely have to somehow measure the motor speed as well.
然而，详细的分析表明，无论你如何操作你的桥，刹车都是一个问题。你要么使用再生制动及其所有的并发症，要么尽量避免它，这也不简单。你可能需要监控电桥电流和电源电压，以确保你不会过度充电。如果你想完全避免再生制动，你很可能不得不测量电机的速度。
The silver lining is that at least you have a fail-safe mode to go back to: you can always set the PWM to 0% duty-cycle, effectively short-circuiting the motor. That will safely brake it down to a halt (almost) without risking to over-charge your battery or causing any other harm to your system. When you do that however, you have no control over how long it will take for the motor to stop though, so while it sounds safe from an electrical perspective, it might not be from the mechanical side.
一线希望是，至少你有一个故障安全模式可以回到：你可以总是把PWM设置为0%的占空比，有效地使电机短路。这将安全地将它刹车到一个停止（几乎）而不会冒着电池过度充电或对系统造成任何其他伤害的风险。然而，当你这样做的时候，你无法控制电机停止所需的时间，因此，虽然从电气角度看，这听起来是安全的，但从机械方面来说，可能不是这样。。
Also, if there’s an external torque applied to the motor, simply short-circuiting it will never completely stop it as the braking torque is proportional to the speed: your electrical car will never stop on a slope just by short-circuiting the motor. You’re battery won’t explode, so there’s some benefit, but you would still end up in the ditch.
此外，如果有一个外部转矩施加在电机上，简单地短路它永远不会完全停止它，因为制动转矩与速度成正比：你的电动车永远不会仅仅通过短路电机就停在斜坡上。你的电池不会爆炸，所以有一些好处，但你还是会掉进水沟里。
Talking about safety, there’s another positive about sign-magnitude drive: you can set the input signals to a static state (0% PWM is basically a constant low- or high- voltage) at which point the motor won’t see any voltage from the battery. This is especially important in systems where some setup is needed on power-on before normal operation can start, like in the case of microcontrollers. You can configure the HW so that the default state of the control pins is such that the motor is safely stationary and only move out from that state only after the system initialization is complete.
说到安全，符号幅度驱动器还有另一个好处: 你可以将输入信号设置为静态(0% 的 PWM 基本上是一个恒定的低电压或高电压) ，在这一点上，电动机不会看到任何电压来自电池。这在系统中特别重要，因为在正常操作开始之前需要进行一些开机设置，就像微控制器的情况一样。您可以配置硬件，使缺省状态的控制引脚是这样的电机是安全静止的，只有从该状态移出后，系统初始化完成。
All in all, sign-magnitude drive seems simple at first, but as with many things, the devil is in the details. For undemanding, simple applications it might be a good fit as it is, in most cases you’re probably going to need some sort of monitoring circuitry that can detect dangerous or unwanted situations and intervene to prevent them.
总而言之，符号幅度驱动一开始看起来很简单，但和许多事情一样，细节决定成败。对于要求不高、简单的应用场合，它可能是一个很好的选择，在大多数情况下，你可能需要一些监测电路，可以发现危险或不需要的情况，并干预。
I will come back to the sign magnitude drive when we will talk about drive circuits and component selection. Before that however I will cover cover the other main drive mode, the lock anti-phase drive and compare the two to each other.
当我们讨论驱动电路和元件选择时，我会回到符号幅度驱动。然而在此之前，我将涵盖其他主驱动模式，锁反相驱动器和比较两个对方。
