我使用 Joshua Bloch 引入的 Java 构建器模式。有时,我发现与原始类型相比,使用默认值初始化某些字段的成本更高。
因此,我的策略就是这样。
- 我延迟了这些字段的默认值初始化操作。
- 在构建过程中,如果调用者之前未设置它们,我只会将它们初始化为默认值。
我不确定是否是good这样做吗?有可能发生什么情况吗?比如线程安全问题?到目前为止,我认为这没有任何问题。
package sandbox;
import java.util.Calendar;
/**
*
* @author yccheok
*/
// Builder Pattern
public class NutritionFacts {
private final int servingSize;
private final int servings;
private final int calories;
private final int fat;
private final int sodium;
private final int carbohydrate;
private final java.util.Calendar calendar; // !!!
public static class Builder {
// Required parameters
private final int servingSize;
private final int servings;
// Optional parameters - initialized to default values
private int calories = 0;
private int fat = 0;
private int carbohydrate = 0;
private int sodium = 0;
// We suppose to provide a default value for calendar. However, it may
// seem expensive. We will do it later during build.
private java.util.Calendar calendar = null;
public Builder(int servingSize, int servings) {
this.servingSize = servingSize;
this.servings = servings;
}
public Builder calories(int val)
{ calories = val; return this; }
public Builder fat(int val)
{ fat = val; return this; }
public Builder carbohydrate(int val)
{ carbohydrate = val; return this; }
public Builder sodium(int val)
{ sodium = val; return this; }
public NutritionFacts build() {
// !!!
if (this.calendar == null) {
this.calendar = Calendar.getInstance();
}
return new NutritionFacts(this);
}
}
private NutritionFacts(Builder builder) {
servingSize = builder.servingSize;
servings = builder.servings;
calories = builder.calories;
fat = builder.fat;
sodium = builder.sodium;
carbohydrate = builder.carbohydrate;
calendar = builder.calendar;
}
}
如果我真的希望日历为空怎么办?那么你的模式就行不通了。否则,对我来说似乎还可以。
本文内容由网友自发贡献,版权归原作者所有,本站不承担相应法律责任。如您发现有涉嫌抄袭侵权的内容,请联系:hwhale#tublm.com(使用前将#替换为@)